MySQL Forums
Forum List  »  Performance

Advanced Search
New Topic

Re: Lots of tables One db vs. Many dbs, less tables. ONE mysql server
Posted by: Boris Burtin
Date: October 26, 2005 05:09PM

I don't think it matters. From what I've gathered, databases are not much more than a way to organize tables into groups. They also give you another level at which to enforce security. More for organization than performance.

Navigate: Previous Message• Next Message
Options: Reply• Quote


Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
Lots of tables One db vs. Many dbs, less tables. ONE mysql server
2064
Erin ONeill
October 26, 2005 01:21PM
Re: Lots of tables One db vs. Many dbs, less tables. ONE mysql server
1331
Boris Burtin
October 26, 2005 05:09PM
Re: Lots of tables One db vs. Many dbs, less tables. ONE mysql server
1356
Erin ONeill
October 27, 2005 04:50PM
Re: Lots of tables One db vs. Many dbs, less tables. ONE mysql server
1292
Gordon Bruce
November 08, 2005 03:36PM
Re: Lots of tables One db vs. Many dbs, less tables. ONE mysql server
1379
Steven Roussey
November 08, 2005 09:19PM
Re: Lots of tables One db vs. Many dbs, less tables. ONE mysql server
1382
Jay Pipes
November 08, 2005 10:05PM
Re: Lots of tables One db vs. Many dbs, less tables. ONE mysql server
1391
Erin ONeill
November 17, 2005 12:30PM


Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.

Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders. It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Oracle or any other party.