Re: healthy ratio of Qcache_hits to Qcache_inserts?
Ok, I think I answered my own (original) question... thanks to Jay Pipes for the hint that 1:1 is a low ratio between Qcache_hits and Qcache_inserts.
By putting SQL_NO_CACHE in the SELECT's that I KNOW won't get 'hit' on subsequent queries, I've reduced Qcache_inserts to virtually zero while keeping Qcache_hits very very high.... my ratio is now infinitely large. Presumably there's also a (slight?) performance gain by explicitly telling MySQL to NOT bother caching a SELECT result that you know will not be reusable.
thanks
JB
Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
11045
November 17, 2005 01:43AM
4349
November 17, 2005 03:00AM
3451
November 17, 2005 09:14AM
3306
November 17, 2005 10:37AM
3178
November 17, 2005 11:09AM
Re: healthy ratio of Qcache_hits to Qcache_inserts?
3214
November 17, 2005 03:51PM
2864
November 17, 2005 05:20PM
2600
November 17, 2005 07:22PM
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion
of Oracle or any other party.