Re: data repartition in cluster
Pierre COLOMBIER Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ok let's use 2**n ndb nodegroups
>
> thats means 1,2,4,16,or 32 ndb nodes (no moree
> because the ID is limitted to 63)
>
> If I use 2 replicas only (I feel that it's not
> enough)
> (yep! I've been experiencing Murphy's law too
> much...)
> the maximum number of nodegroups is 16.
>
> then, that means that with small machines the size
> of the database is quite limitted.
>
> do you plan to extend the maximum number of node
> to something greater than 63 ?
Hi,
I am quite interested in the answer. Is there any document highlighting those issues ?
Thanks for any information about this.
Pierre
Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
1568
June 01, 2005 03:49AM
1025
June 01, 2005 01:04PM
1114
June 07, 2005 10:08AM
Re: data repartition in cluster
1043
October 30, 2006 02:38AM
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion
of Oracle or any other party.