MySQL Forums :: Licensing :: License question

Advanced Search

Re: License question
Posted by: Allan Hardy ()
Date: May 13, 2005 04:56AM

Hi Arjen,

I too am trying to work out MySQL licensing and advise my company and customers. You seem to have a tough job on this, one that I would have thought was well documented by now.

Where you said:
-- See for interpretations of the GPL.

Why? I mean your the copyright holder. Its your interpratation and enforcement thats relavent, not FSFs. They can only advise you.

(Which they have done a poor job of advising anyone with this issue of collective works and linking, so they put you in a bind. )

In any case they can't take action against me for any improper use of mySQL, only you can. So your a much more important source of information then them.

Ed asked some great questions about 'linking' a few posts back. Any Comments?

If we do look to FSF for any help, consider that their compliancy lab guidelines say these types of connections/linking would cause an issue, in thier minds:

1-Static linking with a GPL'ed component

2-Dynamically linking at runtime with a GPL'ed component, through a system such as dlopen(), insmod, or a generally equivalent system.

3-Communication with a GPL'ed component via a rich, non-standard IPC or network interface that gives all the same functionality normally given by static or dynamic linking

4-Distribution of a component that is explicitly designed to link with a specific GPL'ed component. (For example, distributing object code for a GCC front-end and telling the user: "To make this work, get GCC yourself" is considered a violation, but distributing a binary component that requires a standardized, commonly implemented POSIX API is not considered a violation.)

Notice in #3 it points out using non-standard interface to a GPL'ed product is linking.
However SQL is a standard? JDBC, ODBC, are standards?

Notice #4 says using a standard interface is not linking
(for now I am interpreting this as a POSIX API as a meaning a common, standardized API, or interface, like say SQL) and not The POSIX API specifically and only)

So If I implement my commercial app using JDBC, and the customer decides to implement Connect/J and MYSQL, as one of several database options 'they' have, under which definition of linking would my commercial app become a GPL violator?

Perhaps there is a much finer discusison on interfaces and drivers to be had.

Thanks for your time and patience on this. I guess you can tell that some of us find it important. Though I do understand the 'jeez just spend a few bucks on commercial license' idea and hence the question of why spend time and resources. But if you would just do it once it would help. On the other hand you (MySQL AB) choose GPL, with all of its warts and open issues, so sympathy doesn't run to deep :)

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Written By Posted
License question Cristian Daniel Stamateanu 09/13/2004 04:59AM
Re: License question Arjen Lentz 02/15/2005 06:30PM
Re: License question Arne Blankerts 03/01/2005 07:39AM
Re: License question Arjen Lentz 03/03/2005 05:39PM
Re: License question Ed MacDonald 03/24/2005 02:53PM
Re: License question Arjen Lentz 03/24/2005 06:31PM
Re: License question Mihai 03/25/2005 01:57PM
Re: License question Arjen Lentz 03/28/2005 05:46PM
Re: License question Mihai 03/29/2005 12:25AM
Re: License question Arjen Lentz 03/29/2005 12:50AM
Re: License question Ed MacDonald 04/18/2005 12:35PM
Re: License question Arjen Lentz 05/16/2005 10:13PM
Re: License question Grenville Tryon 08/22/2006 12:31PM
Re: License question Ed MacDonald 03/28/2005 11:17AM
Re: License question Ben 03/04/2005 04:13PM
Re: License question Arjen Lentz 03/06/2005 07:13PM
Re: License question Allan Hardy 05/13/2005 04:56AM
Re: License question Arjen Lentz 05/16/2005 10:22PM
Re: License question Yanic G 10/01/2006 11:20PM
Re: License question seshu . 10/16/2006 10:51PM
Re: License question Robin Hickmott 02/28/2007 09:57AM

Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.

Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders. It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Oracle or any other party.