Re: No Dynamic SQL in Function or Trigger Frustration
> that would take 345 million years
Hyperbole like that only serves to undermine the rest of your post.
> The reason for using MySQL straight all along is that the results must, if established to be few enough to store in database on HDD (without reaching Petabyte limits) the results must be retained immediately.
There are many ways to "immediately" store large tranches of data; relational databases are amongst the slowest.
> Validation of constraint ranges from 20 to 70 nested if's, whiles or for's
A set-based language is the wrong tool for that.
> Expand on what R stands for please!?
www.r-project.org
Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
2776
February 27, 2014 06:47PM
1159
February 27, 2014 08:47PM
1126
February 27, 2014 09:11PM
1099
March 14, 2014 07:43PM
1224
March 15, 2014 02:26AM
Re: No Dynamic SQL in Function or Trigger Frustration
1072
March 15, 2014 10:47AM
1056
March 17, 2014 12:29AM
1040
March 17, 2014 10:38PM
1202
March 18, 2014 04:13PM
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion
of Oracle or any other party.