MySQL Forums
Forum List  »  Character Sets, Collation, Unicode

Advanced Search
New Topic

Re: utf8_general_ci (MySQL 5.0.x vs. 5.1.36)
Posted by: Rick James
Date: October 06, 2010 10:30AM

How did you transfer the data? Perhaps things got mangled in that process.

See http://mysql.rjweb.org/doc.php/charcoll
for discussion about how to investigate problems. Look especially at SELECT HEX...

It seems that, in 5.1,
das and daß
are treated equal by utf8_general_ci, but not by utf8_unicode_ci.

Also...
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1036454/what-are-the-diffrences-between-utf8generalci-and-utf8unicodeci

Navigate: Previous Message• Next Message
Options: Reply• Quote


Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
utf8_general_ci (MySQL 5.0.x vs. 5.1.36)
5200
Bozana Bokan
October 05, 2010 07:55AM
Re: utf8_general_ci (MySQL 5.0.x vs. 5.1.36)
1943
Rick James
October 06, 2010 10:30AM
Re: utf8_general_ci (MySQL 5.0.x vs. 5.1.36)
2928
Bozana Bokan
October 07, 2010 04:52AM
Re: utf8_general_ci (MySQL 5.0.x vs. 5.1.36)
1710
Peter Gulutzan
October 07, 2010 11:32AM
Re: utf8_general_ci (MySQL 5.0.x vs. 5.1.36)
1551
Bozana Bokan
October 08, 2010 06:24AM


Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.

Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders. It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Oracle or any other party.