Re: Optimize subquery, replace IN() with JOIN
Miron,
I missed a loop of the subquery logic, which is to find content_ids having a category_id with a particular content_id.
Here is that logic as a join, for the first id in your example content table, 1807:
SELECT a.content_id
FROM category_content_se a
JOIN category_content_se b ON a.category_id=b.category_id AND b.content_id=1807
WHERE a.content_typ = 'actual' ;
Substituting that into your original query, and adding DISTINCT because IN() semijoins remove dupes but JOINs do not, we get ...
SELECT DISTINCT c.id, c.title, c.alias
FROM content c
JOIN category_content_se a ON c.id=a.content_id
JOIN category_content_se b ON a.category_id=b.category_id AND b.content_id=1807
WHERE a.content_typ = 'actual' AND c.published = 1 AND c.typ = 'actual'
ORDER BY c.date_add DESC LIMIT 10 ;
which gives the same result as your original query on the example tables.
Now as Øystein says, the puzzle is why your original query performs so slowly. In 5.6 your original query runs in 0.00 sec on a modest machine. Can we see the Explain results for the query on production data, the one that takes 5 minutes? Also let's see the mysql version number, machine RAM, and innodb_buffer_pool_size setting.
Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
2453
November 15, 2016 02:37PM
998
November 15, 2016 03:34PM
1138
November 15, 2016 04:25PM
978
November 17, 2016 08:11PM
948
November 22, 2016 02:44PM
967
November 16, 2016 04:03AM
Re: Optimize subquery, replace IN() with JOIN
988
November 16, 2016 12:51PM
1104
November 16, 2016 03:22PM
939
November 16, 2016 04:44PM
746
December 27, 2016 05:32AM
851
November 16, 2016 01:50AM
901
November 16, 2016 04:01AM
1057
November 16, 2016 06:23AM