Re: business users services
First of all I want to say that you are right,the 3rd table is not redundant as I have adopted a many-to-many relationship.
Now I want to make two important points.
First
Currently the app has one registered business user with 3 services associated with him.
That means that the b_user column of the busers_services table will have the same value for 3 rows,each row indicating with whom b_user a service is associated with.
If for example the above b_user has an ID of 10,this will appear 3 times.
How do you comment this from an efficiency standpoint?Related to the DB of course
Is there a better alternative you think?
Second.
Two different B_users may offer the same service.For example hair salons offering a haircut(something not unusual at all.)
In such a case we might have two or more service_IDs being different but corresponding to the same service.That will occupy unnecessary DB space.
How could I deal with it?
Let us focus on these two for now.
Subject
Written By
Posted
September 03, 2014 01:55AM
September 05, 2014 01:22PM
September 22, 2014 11:43AM
September 25, 2014 04:07PM
Re: business users services
August 03, 2014 08:48AM
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion
of Oracle or any other party.