Re: table locking expected behavior
Ah, now I understand your question. #3 has a read lock. That being said, the way you explain this makes it sound like declaring a read lock is useless. If an implied read lock acts the same as a declared read lock, why bother?
Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
3388
January 17, 2006 07:56PM
2075
January 17, 2006 10:44PM
1996
January 18, 2006 12:18AM
2022
January 18, 2006 01:53AM
2007
January 18, 2006 03:46PM
2102
January 18, 2006 10:30PM
2078
January 20, 2006 11:18AM
2136
January 20, 2006 11:22PM
Re: table locking expected behavior
2051
January 22, 2006 03:24PM
2082
January 22, 2006 06:46PM
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion
of Oracle or any other party.