MySQL Forums
Forum List  »  Performance

Re: 5.0 cannot be that much worse than 4.1?
Posted by: Richard Mixon
Date: September 22, 2006 02:37PM

Can anybody offer any suggestions?

I just ran bonnie++ on both machines, here are the results:

Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
new.server.com 8G 11421 22 11592 4 8446 2 25490 45 144285 15 337.5 0
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++
new.server.com,8G,11421,22,11592,4,8446,2,25490,45,144285,15,337.5,0,16,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++

Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
old.server.com 8G 29202 93 32788 28 21697 10 31292 77 39064 11 222.2 0
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 2063 72 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 2928 98 +++++ +++ 6826 92
old.server.com,8G,29202,93,32788,28,21697,10,31292,77,39064,11,222.2,0,16,2063,72,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,2928,98,+++++,+++,6826,92

The old machine appears faster, still.

Thanks - Richard

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
2346
September 21, 2006 09:41PM
Re: 5.0 cannot be that much worse than 4.1?
1050
September 22, 2006 02:37PM
1172
September 25, 2006 03:20AM


Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.

Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders. It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Oracle or any other party.