Re: data repartition in cluster

[Crepieux Pierre]

Pierre COLOMBIER Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ok let's use 2**n ndb nodegroups
>
> thats means 1,2,4,16,or 32 ndb nodes (no moree
> because the ID is limitted to 63)
>
> If I use 2 replicas only (I feel that it's not
> enough)
> (yep! I've been experiencing Murphy's law too
> much...)
> the maximum number of nodegroups is 16.
>
> then, that means that with small machines the size
> of the database is quite limitted.
>
> do you plan to extend the maximum number of node
> to something greater than 63 ?

Hi,

I am quite interested in the answer. Is there any document highlighting those issues ?

Thanks for any information about this.

Pierre