Re: data repartition in cluster
ok let's use 2**n ndb nodegroups
thats means 1,2,4,16,or 32 ndb nodes (no moree because the ID is limitted to 63)
If I use 2 replicas only (I feel that it's not enough)
(yep! I've been experiencing Murphy's law too much...)
the maximum number of nodegroups is 16.
then, that means that with small machines the size of the database is quite limitted.
do you plan to extend the maximum number of node to something greater than 63 ?
Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
1560
June 01, 2005 03:49AM
1022
June 01, 2005 01:04PM
Re: data repartition in cluster
1107
June 07, 2005 10:08AM
1040
October 30, 2006 02:38AM
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion
of Oracle or any other party.