Re: Which approach is better?
Posted by: weitat chok
Date: November 09, 2006 08:59PM

Bob Field Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'd go with case 2, you have greater flexibility,
> you can add settings without changing your
> database design.

But all those setting, jz like a toggle, on/off, which mean if setting A for campaign 5 is "on", then perform one of the operation, and skip for other with setting A = off, then the same theory apply to other setting, then, finally, come out more than 100 tables [not all related setting :p ]

Coz, we maybe hv student, then 5 setting, campaign, 6 setting, but for those setting can actually be embedded inside student or campaign which only add in more field for them.

So, as a software designer, i always struggle with myself, and dono which is the better solution

Thanks

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject
Written By
Posted
November 07, 2006 02:55AM
November 08, 2006 06:19PM
Re: Which approach is better?
November 09, 2006 08:59PM
November 09, 2006 09:17PM
November 09, 2006 10:52PM
November 16, 2006 09:34PM
November 16, 2006 09:51PM
November 16, 2006 10:14PM
November 17, 2006 12:18AM
November 19, 2006 09:33PM


Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.

Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders. It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Oracle or any other party.