MySQL Forums :: Performance :: text vs varchar


Advanced Search

Re: text vs varchar
Posted by: Øystein Grøvlen ()
Date: May 02, 2016 04:37AM

Hi Rick,

No, I am referring to that when a row is read from storage engine into MySQL server, the size of the buffer allocated for the row is the maximum row size. However, only the column values that are actually needed will be copied into this buffer. So more memory will be allocated than if TEXT was used instead of VARCHAR.

I did not consider temporary tables in my answer since the question stated that such columns would only be fetched by look-up on primary key. If so, temporary tables should not apply. It is also the case that for temporary tables with VARCHAR(n) columns where n > 512, MEMORY will not be used. Hence, with respect to temporary tables, behavior should be the same regardless of whether column is VARCHAR(4000) and TEXT.

Øystein Grøvlen,
Senior Principal Software Engineer,
MySQL Group, Oracle,
Trondheim, Norway

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
text vs varchar 750 hua kai 04/28/2016 08:36AM
Re: text vs varchar 376 Øystein Grøvlen 04/29/2016 12:41AM
Re: text vs varchar 390 Rick James 04/30/2016 11:51PM
Re: text vs varchar 418 Øystein Grøvlen 05/02/2016 04:37AM
Re: text vs varchar 358 hua kai 05/02/2016 09:14PM
Re: text vs varchar 366 Øystein Grøvlen 05/03/2016 02:19AM
Re: text vs varchar 549 hua kai 05/03/2016 04:12AM
Re: text vs varchar 340 hua kai 05/02/2016 08:02PM
Re: text vs varchar 460 Øystein Grøvlen 05/03/2016 02:25AM


Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.

Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders. It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Oracle or any other party.