Re: Mysql 5.0 ARCHIVE and auto_increment question.
Posted by:
Brian Aker
Date: December 25, 2005 12:25PM
Jay Pike wrote:
> I can see the argument towards the indexed field
> for the autoincrement... makes it easier to
> determine the next value if the field is already
> in memory... I like the fake-it idea, for Archive
> tables.
If I have time I will go in and see what it would take to allow autoincrements without indexes. That would solve the problem and be a bit faster then using an SP for this. So far I have not come up with a good method to allow anyone to see the hidden key of a table supports it.
Happy holidays,
-Brian
Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
11781
December 23, 2005 01:33PM
4689
December 23, 2005 02:09PM
4483
December 23, 2005 04:09PM
4246
December 23, 2005 04:11PM
Re: Mysql 5.0 ARCHIVE and auto_increment question.
4232
December 25, 2005 12:25PM
4113
January 10, 2006 03:30PM
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion
of Oracle or any other party.