Re: MySQL Proxy: Scenarios
Posted by:
Rick Blundell ()
Date: July 10, 2007 12:01AM
Hi. I am glad to see this forum is well read, I'm happy to discuss HA mysql from my experience.
If mysql-cluster worked like I think it should and could, I don't think mysql-proxy would be completely necessary. LVS+mysql-cluster could create a great hA solution, but the requirement for NDB on -cluster causes some application incompatability issues. Anyway, -cluster does a good job, its just not designed for a straight up mysqld replacement right now. I think -proxy and mysqld-replication can be a replacement for mysqld but allow good HA/distributed work without a replication aware application. What I mean by that is an application that supports reads from mysqld A,b,C and writes to mysqld D.
APP -> mysql-proxy --> write --> master mysqld -|
______________\<-- read <-- slave mysqld 1 -|[replication]
______________\<-- read <-- slave mysqld 2 -|
What I am really after is mysqld distribution without an intelligent application. I am very confident -proxy can deliver this with an LUA script that allows the backend to be selected after the query is read.
HA is rather tiresome because then we need redundant mysql-proxyies and masters ;)
Rick Blundell
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 07/10/2007 12:23AM by Rick Blundell.
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders. It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion of Oracle or any other party.