Re: Advice on partitioning
Posted by:
Rick James
Date: April 24, 2015 05:34PM
Based on what you say, I see no advantage from PARTITIONing. Furthermore, 1000 partitions will show you down (until about 5.7).
But maybe PARTITIONing could be useful...
Please provide SHOW CREATE TABLE -- This is to study the potential impact of PARTITIONing on the indexes, and vice versa.
Please provide a sampling of the important queries -- This is to judge which (if any!) will be sped up by PARTITIONing.
Please provide some size information -- This is to get a feel for CPU-bound vs IO-bound.
Some notes:
* In almost no case will a point query (eg, SELECT on PRIMARY KEY) be sped up by partitioning.
* INSERTs/UPDATEs open _all_ partitions before deciding what to do -- This can be a drawback, especially for 1000 partitions. (Oracle is working on 'fixing' that.)
* I have yet to see a significant performance improvement for anything other than BY RANGE.
Since you say that BY HASH is 'better', I am eager to hear more details.
Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
2964
April 24, 2015 01:40PM
Re: Advice on partitioning
1722
April 24, 2015 05:34PM
1743
April 27, 2015 09:05AM
1705
April 27, 2015 02:22PM
1538
April 28, 2015 11:02AM
1560
April 28, 2015 12:32PM
1513
April 28, 2015 04:07PM
1421
June 15, 2015 06:39PM
1552
June 15, 2015 07:05PM
1489
June 16, 2015 06:40PM
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion
of Oracle or any other party.