Re: very poor performance of opening tables
Posted by:
J G
Date: October 16, 2005 11:25AM
> Why 1600/s? Is this number based on previous
> performance numbers before you started
> experiencing issues?
I am able to reach about 2000q/s using the same queries but operating on limited number of tables (just flooding one of my sites).
> any specific reason why Gentoo would perform any
> better in this scenario than FreeBSD.
It supports faster filesystems (for exaple ReiserFS, XFS, JFS). Any way, IMHO, UFS+softupdates is more safe in my case.
> thing I can think of that may give you a
> performance benefit on Gentoo is doing a stage 1
> install with NPTL (Native Posix Thread Library)
> compiled into the kernel (use the USE flags: nptl
> nptlonly and remember you'll have to unmask for
> the most recent MySQL version when you emerge
> MySQL...).
Yes, I know it about it.
Best Regards
J G
Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
20999
September 23, 2005 06:11AM
8365
September 23, 2005 08:59AM
5511
September 23, 2005 10:23AM
5196
September 23, 2005 10:40AM
4580
September 23, 2005 10:51AM
4838
September 25, 2005 09:45AM
4413
September 25, 2005 10:34AM
5834
September 25, 2005 11:16AM
4138
September 26, 2005 06:02AM
Re: very poor performance of opening tables
3913
October 16, 2005 11:25AM
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion
of Oracle or any other party.