Re: Optimizing ORDER BY any ideas?
I got the \G working in the terminal.
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: SIMPLE
table: T_PROGRAM_PRODUCT
type: ref
possible_keys: PMP_LNK_PROGRAM,PMP_LNK_CHANNEL,PMP_LNK_PRODUCT
key: PMP_LNK_CHANNEL
key_len: 4
ref: const
rows: 16
Extra: Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort
*************************** 2. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: SIMPLE
table: T_SALES_ORDER_ITEM
type: ref
possible_keys: SOI_INDEX,SOI_LNK_PRODUCT,INDEX_LNK_SOA_PRODUCT
key: SOI_LNK_PRODUCT
key_len: 4
ref: tvplanner4.T_PROGRAM_PRODUCT.PMP_LNK_PRODUCT
rows: 412
Extra:
*************************** 3. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: SIMPLE
table: T_SALES_ORDER
type: eq_ref
possible_keys: SAO_INDEX
key: SAO_INDEX
key_len: 4
ref: tvplanner4.T_SALES_ORDER_ITEM.SOI_LNK_SALES_ORDER
rows: 1
Extra: Using index
*************************** 4. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: SIMPLE
table: T_SCHEDULE_ITEM
type: ref
possible_keys: SCI_FINISHED_DATE,SCI_START_DATE,SCI_LNK_CHANNEL,SCI_LNK_SALES_ORDER_ITEM,SCI_LNK_MEDIUM
key: SCI_LNK_SALES_ORDER_ITEM
key_len: 4
ref: tvplanner4.T_SALES_ORDER_ITEM.SOI_INDEX
rows: 6
Extra: Using where; Distinct
*************************** 5. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: SIMPLE
table: T_PROPERTY
type: eq_ref
possible_keys: PRY_LNK_SALES_ORDER_ITEM
key: PRY_LNK_SALES_ORDER_ITEM
key_len: 4
ref: tvplanner4.T_SCHEDULE_ITEM.SCI_LNK_SALES_ORDER_ITEM
rows: 1
Extra: Using where; Distinct
Subject
Views
Written By
Posted
5447
September 06, 2005 05:35PM
2988
September 06, 2005 06:39PM
3181
September 06, 2005 08:30PM
2928
September 06, 2005 09:18PM
2908
September 07, 2005 07:10AM
Re: Optimizing ORDER BY any ideas?
2962
September 07, 2005 06:28PM
2992
September 07, 2005 08:55PM
2788
September 08, 2005 08:28AM
2851
September 08, 2005 11:12PM
2860
September 09, 2005 10:00AM
2804
September 09, 2005 10:22AM
2845
September 09, 2005 10:03PM
3080
September 10, 2005 07:30AM
3550
September 10, 2005 09:22AM
2856
September 12, 2005 02:45PM
2754
September 12, 2005 04:41PM
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
Content reproduced on this site is the property of the respective copyright holders.
It is not reviewed in advance by Oracle and does not necessarily represent the opinion
of Oracle or any other party.